SAFE
CIC
The Safeguarding Specialists
01379 871091

SAFE Newsfeed

Regulated activity with children: myth busting the September 2026 Supervision Exemption changes

Source: Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) published on this website Tuesday 8 September 2026 by Jill Powell

From 01 September 2026, the definition of regulated activity with children is changing. Full details of the changes can be found in this GOV.UK article: Change to the definition of regulated activity with children from 1 September 2026.

In this article, DBS will address some of the common misconceptions about what this change means in practice.

“The removal of the supervision exemption only applies to England”

This is incorrect.

The change applies in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

“The supervision exemption applies to adults and children”

This is incorrect.

The removal of the supervision exemption only affects the definition of regulated activity with children. The concept of a supervision exemption does not apply to regulated activity with adults, so there is no corresponding change to the definition of regulated activity with adults.

“Removal of the supervision exemption is only applicable to education settings and volunteers”

This is incorrect.

The removal of the supervision exemption is not limited to education settings, and it is not just about volunteers. The change applies wherever the relevant regulated activity with children criteria are met, including roles in sectors such as sports clubs, charities, youth organisations, outdoor activity providers and cultural organisations, as well as schools and colleges. Both paid staff and volunteers may be affected depending on the nature and frequency of their work with children.

“This legislative change means that I must now carry out a DBS check”

This is incorrect.

The legislation does not create a new requirement for organisations to carry out DBS checks, nor does DBS mandate that checks must be obtained. Employers and organisations remain responsible for assessing their roles and determining whether a DBS check is appropriate and what level of check is legally available.

“As an organisation I don’t need to review our DBS re-checking arrangements”

This is incorrect.

The removal of the supervision exemption provides a timely opportunity for organisations to review their workforce and volunteer safeguarding checks.

Organisations may wish to prioritise or accelerate DBS checking for those whose existing certificates do not contain a Children’s Barred List check.

“We can’t carry out an Enhanced with Children’s Barred List DBS check in advance of the 01 September change”

This is incorrect.

As long as the other elements of regulated activity are met, then organisations can apply for an Enhanced with Children’s Barred List DBS check in advance of the 01 September 2026 change.

“Legally, we have to suspend (or change the duties of) individuals who haven’t been subject to an Enhanced with Children’s Barred List DBS check”

This is incorrect.

The removal of the supervision exemption changes whether a role is considered regulated activity with children; it does not prescribe how organisations should manage individuals while recruitment or checking processes are completed.

The legislation does not require an organisation to remove an individual from their role solely because a DBS check application is being processed.

Decisions about whether an individual can continue undertaking their duties pending the outcome of a DBS check are a matter for the employer or organisation, taking account of their safeguarding responsibilities, risk assessment processes, and any sector-specific requirements. Employers and organisations can choose to put whatever safeguards in place they decide are appropriate while awaiting a DBS check. The key change is that supervision of paid staff and volunteers no longer determines whether the role itself is regulated activity with children.

“It is not possible to get a standalone Children’s Barred List check”

 This depends on the situation.  

Schools and other education providers may also be able to access a standalone Children’s Barred List check through the Department for Education’s (DfE’s) checking service in the limited circumstances described in DfE guidance.

Check the children’s barred list - GOV.UK

This route is limited to the organisations and circumstances set out in DfE guidance and is not available to all employers. Organisations outside these sectors cannot obtain a standalone Children’s Barred List check from DBS and should instead seek the appropriate Enhanced with Children’s Barred List DBS check where eligibility exists.

“There is no support out there on removal of the supervision exemption”

This is incorrect.

The DBS Regional Outreach team are here to help.

Organisations that are unsure how the removal of the supervision exemption may affect their workforce can attend a DBS Disclosure and Eligibility Workshop.  

Contact details for the Regional Outreach team, including direct email addresses for the adviser from your region, can be found on the DBS Regional Outreach service GOV.UK page.

Key takeaway

The removal of the supervision exemption does not mean every role involving working with children becomes regulated activity with children. Organisations should continue to consider the nature of the activity, how often it is carried out, and any other relevant criteria set out in DBS eligibility guidance.

Where a role was previously identified by the employer or organisation as outside of the regulated activity with children criteria solely because of supervision, this legislative change means that eligibility moves from an Enhanced DBS check to an Enhanced with Children’s Barred List DBS check.

New law to ban depraved child-like sexual abuse dolls

Source: Home Office published on this website Monday 7 September 2026 by Jill Powell

The government has backed a new law banning depraved child-like sexual abuse dolls. 

The Child-like Sexual Abuse Dolls (Offences) Private Members’ Bill, which has progressed to committee stage, will make it illegal to buy, sell or own these vile dolls. Anyone caught with one could face up to 5 years behind bars.

Police have encountered these items while investigating child sexual abuse suspects and when monitoring registered sex offenders, but current legislation does not provide a specific offence for owning or making these dolls. By closing this crucial loophole, the bill will give police greater powers, stopping abusers and helping to prevent them from harming real children.

Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls, SaCir Kaur said:

“Children must be protected from sexual abuse in every form – online, offline and wherever the threat appears. As the mum of a young child myself, I am horrified these disturbing dolls even exist. This new law will mean we can seize them and prosecute anyone involved in their sick trade.

“This government is supporting this bill as part of our drive to expose abuse sooner, disrupt offenders faster and protect more vulnerable children from these horrors.”

The bill builds on tough new measures in the Crime and Policing Act 2026 to intensify the response to both online and contact child sexual abuse. These include:

  • bringing in a mandatory duty for people in key roles to report suspected child sexual abuse
  • creating a new offence for anyone interfering with the duty to report
  • making grooming an aggravating factor when courts sentence child sexual offences
  • world-leading new offences to fight the rising tide of AI child sexual abuse material
  • giving Border Force more powers to stop digital child sexual abuse material at our borders

These legal efforts are buttressed by historic levels of funding. The government recently announced a record £100 million to combat child sexual abuse, improve the police response to these crimes, go after offenders and give victims and survivors the protection and support they need.

CEASE welcomes the government’s support for this hugely important bill to ban child-like sexual abuse dolls. This is an important step forward for child protection – we applaud the government for listening to the evidence and backing decisive action to close this dangerous legislative gap. It sends a clear and welcome signal that there should be no place in our society for products that risk normalising the sexual abuse of children.

With the government now firmly behind this bill as it progresses through Parliament, we need to see the same courage and urgency applied to digital equivalents of child-like sexual abuse dolls.

Jail for paedophile snared by activist group

Source: Court News Cambridge Constabulary published on this website Monday 17 August 2026 by Jill Powell

A man who shared explicit images of himself with what he mistakenly thought was a 14-year-old girl has been jailed.

Iain Fleming, 53, began communicating with the account in March last year, not knowing it was a decoy run by an online child abuse activist group.

Despite the “girl” telling Fleming she was only 14 several times, he continued sexual communication with her and sent explicit images of himself.

Police were contacted by the child activist group, and officers swiftly arrested Fleming at his Peterborough home.

After seizing his mobile phone, it was also revealed Fleming had contacted what was believed to be a 15-year-old girl. Again, Fleming continued with explicit conversations, telling her she had a beautiful body and that he wanted to kiss her all over.

At Peterborough Crown Court on 7 August, Fleming, of Millfield, Peterborough, was jailed for three years and two months after admitting to two counts of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child, and one count of attempting to incite a girl to engage in sexual activity.

DC Lloyd Davis, who investigated, said: “Fleming clearly poses a significant risk to children.

“Despite the ‘girl’ in this case being a decoy account, Fleming still attempted to prey on and groom what he believed was a child.

“This kind of sexual exploitation can have devastating effects on a child’s development, mental health and self-esteem that continue into adulthood, so I am pleased he is now behind bars for his crimes.”

For more on child abuse, including how to report it and spot the signs, please visit the dedicated pages on the force website.

Be aware of TV Licensing scam email

Source: Which published on this website Tuesday 25 August 2026 by Jill Powell

A scam email which tells you that your TV Licence payment has failed, encourages you to follow a malicious link to make payment.

The email threatens a £1,000 fine, but the link directs you to a fraudulent TV Licensing website designed to steal your personal and financial information when you enter them. 

Scam emails like this can be reported by forwarding them to report@phishing.gov.uk and websites to the National Cyber Security Centre

To see a copy of the fake email and other recent scams The latest scam alerts from Which? - Which?

Man jailed for online child sex offences

Source: Northamptonshire Police published on this website Friday 7 August 2026 by Jill Powell

A 38-year-old man who was issued with a Sexual Risk Order (SRO) while under investigation for online child sex offences has been jailed for more than four years.

Liam Pink, formerly Kettering, was issued with the civil order in October 2022 at Northampton Magistrates’ Court which are used to manage those who pose a sexual harm risk to the public.

Northamptonshire Police applied for the SRO after Pink’s arrest on suspicion of attempting to cause/incite a girl under 13 to engage in a sexual activity and attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child.

This followed allegations from an online activist group that between August 12 and 28, Pink had engaged in an online conversation, exchanging explicit messages of a sexual nature, with a 12-year-old girl. However, she didn’t exist and was in fact a decoy.

The five-year SRO was issued with certain conditions he was required to abide by, including not having unsupervised contact or communication with any child under the age of 16, not using any social media account unless in the name of Liam Pink and not using any device capable of accessing the internet without notifying police.

During a routine visit on April 9 this year, officers from Northamptonshire Police’s MOSOVO team, which closely manage sexual and violent offenders, arrested Pink after an examination of his mobile phone found that he had breached the SRO three times.

Between January 1 and March 31, there was evidence to suggest that he had had contact with a child under the age of two without the parent’s knowledge of his order. He had also failed to notify police about a social media account that he had set up using a different name.

Pink was subsequently charged with the three breaches of the SRO as well as the online child sex offences that he was under investigation for and on June 3, he pleaded guilty to all five offences at Northampton Magistrates’ Court.

His case was sent to Northampton Crown Court for sentencing, and on July 13, he was jailed for four years and four months and issued with an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order and placed on the Sex Offenders Register.

Risk Management Officer Libbie Stiff from the Force’s MOSOVO Team, said: “We take an absolute zero-tolerance approach to situations like this. Liam Pink’s repeat offending showed that he had a blatant disregard for the sanctions imposed by the court, and I am pleased that this sentence reflects the serious risk that he poses.

“I also hope this case reassures the public that we are working proactively to continue to keep children in Northamptonshire safe from online predators and to bring anyone who threatens that safety to justice.”