SAFE
CIC
The Safeguarding Specialists
01379 871091

SAFE Newsfeed

Government regulation of maternity nurses, nannies and the infant sleep industry

Source: Commons Library Research published on this website Monday 8 June 2026 by Jill Powell

There will be a debate to be announced, on government regulation of maternity nurses, nannies and the infant sleep industry.

The NHS has produced various webpages on baby sleep advice:

Stakeholder concerns

Various stakeholders have raised concerns about a lack of regulation regarding who can give advice on infants sleeping and misinformation online that could put infants’ health at harm.

In May 2026, a BBC investigation found some “self-described sleep experts” were giving new parents advice that goes against established NHS safe sleep guidelines. In the investigation, stakeholders raised concerns about a lack of support and guidance for parents and a lack of qualifications needed for someone to call themselves a “sleep expert” or “maternity nurse”. Stakeholders called for further regulation of advice being given in the industry to make sure it is evidence-based and safe, and training for people giving advice.

The charity lullaby trust has warned against “misleading marketing” around baby products. Research published in March 2026 by the lullaby trust found that from a survey of 1,000 UK parents and carers, while 95% said they felt confident about baby sleep safety, only 5% were able to correctly identify all safer sleep set-ups when shown a range of sleep environments. The survey found parents and carers reported items that don’t follow NHS safer sleep guidelines, such as cuddly toys or a blanket, present in 9 out of 10 baby sleep spaces, and many parents believed they were harmless “highlighting how easily unsafe practices can become normalised through clever marketing”.

Protected titles

In the UK, some health professions (such as doctors) are regulated by law. This includes the protection of the professional title and the requirement for professionals to be registered with a designated regulator to practise. For example, only those registered with the General Medical Council (GMC) can legally refer to themselves as a “medical practitioner,” and only those on the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) register can use the title “registered nurse.”

Whilst “registered nurse” is currently a protected title, “nurse” is not. Various stakeholders, including parliamentarians, have called for “nurse” to be a protected title to prevent the spread of misinformation and people using the title without registered nursing qualifications.

In May 2025, the government announced plans to introduce legislation in this Parliament to fully protect the title of “nurse”. The government’s press release said “there will be exemptions for relevant professions like veterinary nurse, dental nurse and nursery nurse, where the title ‘nurse’ is legitimately used”. 

Regulation of childcare providers

All childcare providers registered with OFSTED on the Early Years Register (providing learning, development and care of children from birth to 5) are required to follow the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) statutory framework, which requires babies to be placed down to sleep in line with the latest government safety guidance. There are also minimum qualification requirements that staff must meet in order to be included in the mandatory staff-to-child ratios  (see written parliamentary question 103417 [on Pre-school Education: Sleep], 4 February 2026).

Nannies and home carers do not have to register with OFSTED but they can join the voluntary part of the Childcare Register if they wish. They are not able to join the Early Years Register. Childcare providers registered on the voluntary part of the Childcare Register, and not the Early Years Register, such as nannies, do not have to follow the EYFS statutory framework (see written parliamentary question 31566 [on Nannies: Registration].

Reading List

Nursery World, Updates to EYFS framework to strengthen safer sleep requirements after Genevieve Meehan’s death, 31 March 2026

BBC News, Dangerous baby-sleep advice given to parents by self-described experts, secret filming reveals, 5 May 2026

BBC News, Calls for ‘urgent action’ on baby-sleep industry after BBC investigation, 12 May 2026

National Nanny Association, Nanny Regulation in the UK: The Road to Regulation

Parliamentary material

Parliamentary question

Maternity Care (14 April 2026, 783 c675)

Asked: Regulation of infant sleep industry and that ‘maternity nurse’ is not a protected term.

Answered: There will shortly be a review into the title of ‘nurse’, and changes to ensure ‘nurse’ is a professional title.

Mann Review recommendations a much-needed boost to tackling antisemitism and racism, says PSA

Source: The Professional Standards Authority (PSA) published on this website Friday 4 June 2026 by Jill Powell

The Professional Standards Authority (PSA) welcomes the publication of the Lord Mann Review which looked at how the regulatory system for healthcare professionals tackles antisemitism and other forms of racism at every stage, from employment through to professional oversight. 

Racism and antisemitism in the NHS can have a major impact on public trust and confidence in professionals and in healthcare services more widely, and can make patients and families, as well as staff feel unsafe. It is important that professional regulators, along with other parts of the system, play their part in combatting it robustly. 

The Review recommends expanded powers for the PSA. These include a new power for the PSA to appeal interim order decisions which are made ahead of a final decision on a healthcare professional’s fitness to practise. Interim orders can be used to prevent or restrict a professional’s practice before a full investigation is undertaken in cases where there is a significant risk to public safety or confidence. There is also a new power proposed for the PSA to require that the General Medical Council (GMC) shares information with us. This is intended to support our oversight role. These proposed powers are currently being consulted on as part of the new legislative framework for the GMC. 

Lord Mann’s Review also recommends additional accountability arrangements and enhanced expectations for the PSA on convening and communicating with regulators about their responsibilities in this area. There is a range of further recommendations for regulators, employers and wider stakeholders.  

We welcome the recommendations set out in the Review and will begin to plan how we will work with others to take them forward. We will publish further information later this month about the new proposed powers in our response to the consultation on the GMC’s new legislation.

The Charity Commission has today published new guidance to help charity trustees make confident, responsible grant-making decisions at a time when many charities are facing sustained financial pressure. 

Source: The Charity Commission published on this website Wednesday 3 June 2026 by Jill Powell

Thousands of charities carry out their purposes by making grants to other organisations. This guidance explores the fundamentals of effective grant-making, from setting funding priorities and carrying out due diligence, to monitoring grants and reporting impact.   

In March, the charity regulator revealed that grant-making charities awarded £17.84 billion in grants during 2024, up from £16.97 billion in 2023, which included £12 billion to other charities. However, for a third year in a row, the analysis has shown an ongoing financial squeeze in parts of the sector. This follows a three-fold increase in demand for charitable services across England and Wales.   

The new guidance replaces and expands on previous guidance to now cover all grant making. It makes it clearer that grant-making charities have the flexibility to provide unrestricted grants to charities with the same, or narrower, purposes than their own. This gives charities that receive grants the freedom to use funds how they think best. Funds must be used to further a charity’s purposes, but an unrestricted grant enables trustees to be responsive to things like changing beneficiary needs in their area of work, changes to their activities and can help cover core costs to ensure continued operation.   

The guidance explains that charities can fund organisations that are not charities, which can help reach new beneficiaries or grow grant-making charities’ impact. This can be particularly effective in communities where there are very few charities operating. However, given that non-charities are less regulated, trustees must take reasonable steps to assess and manage potential risks.  

In all cases, grant-making charities must have a written agreement in place and should monitor it to make sure the recipient organisation is meeting the agreed terms. The Commission expects charities to complete appropriate checks on potential recipients of funds, including ensuring they understand how the organisation operates, checking if it is genuine, and that the grant can be effectively monitored.   

The guidance has been updated as part of the Commission’s work programme of supporting effective philanthropy across England and Wales, in line with the regulator’s five-year strategy. The full guide can be found on gov.uk.   

Mazeda Alam, Head of Trustee Guidance at the Charity Commission said: 

Many charities are finding it hard to keep running services that communities increasingly depend on. We also know that securing funding for core costs — the kind that keeps a charity running — can be a significant challenge.   

“Grant-making charities and philanthropists play a vital yet often unappreciated role in providing financial support to the sector. This guidance is designed to give them the flexibility to use their best judgement when awarding funds and encourage them to do so confidently, growing the reach of their support.  

Any funding decision must ultimately be driven by one question: will this help the grant-making charity further its purpose, and make a difference to the people and causes it exists to serve? This guidance gives trustees assurance that they can answer that question, and to make decisions that are both bold and responsible.”

Open Consultation: Information sharing duty statutory guidance published 2 June 2026

Source: Department for Education published o this website Thursday 4 June 2026 by Jill Powell

We would like your views on draft statutory guidance on the information sharing duty introduced in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act.

This consultation is being held on another website

This consultation closes at
11:59pm on 14 July 2026

Consultation description

We are seeking views on draft statutory guidance, including a data sharing agreement template. These are designed to:

  • set out the new information sharing duty, and who it’s for
  • help organisations and practitioners to interpret and apply the legislation in practice

The duty will apply from September 2026.

The statutory guidance is intended to:

  • promote consistent implementation
  • support a cultural shift in how information sharing is understood and practised across sectors

It will replace the Department for Education’s existing guidance on information sharing.

The statutory guidance on working together to safeguard children will still apply.

We are seeking responses from safeguarding organisations and their practitioners.

Former private school teacher jailed for multiple non recent sexual assaults

Source: Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) published on Tuesday 2 June 2026 by Jill Powell

An ex-private school teacher has been imprisoned for numerous child sexual abuse offences against former pupils. David James Clarke, 82, previously  found guilty at Lewes Crown Court of 45 counts of child sexual abuse and has now been sentenced to 26 years imprisonment.

The Sussex police investigation and subsequent Crown Prosecution Service uncovered that while Clarke was a teacher at Newlands School, Seaford, East Sussex, committed 38 counts of indecent assault and 5 offences of gross indecency with a child, and one offence of buggery.  He was also convicted of one count of making indecent images of children.  

The defendant ran a photography club and in the dark room he would sexually abuse his pupils. The defendant took advantage of running the Photography Club to isolate the boys where he began by hugging them and asking them to sit on his lap before progressing to touching their genitals under and over clothing, escalating to mutual masturbation and, on occasion, oral sex and buggery. 

When he was arrested when the police discovered indecent images of children on his desk top computer.
 
Claire Brinton, Specialist Prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service, said:

“David James Clarke preyed on 14 children at school, who were vulnerable because of their age, many who were isolated, away from their homes and families. Clarke was a teacher, in a position of enormous responsibility who exploited them for his own hideous and vile sexual gratification, often using threats and bribes to manipulate his way to abuse numerous boys in his care.  

“I hope this sentencing send a clear message that the CPS, working closely alongside law enforcement, will relentlessly pursue justice and prosecute those who sexually exploit children and adults, whenever that abuse took place and that Clarke’s imprisonment offers some comfort to the victims’ families and friends.

“All children have the right to feel safe. I encourage anyone who has been in a similar position to come forward to report these incidents to the police. It is never too late to seek justice - you are not alone and there is help available.”