SAFE
CIC
The Safeguarding Specialists
01379 871091

SAFE Newsfeed

Immaterialism partners with IWF to boost fight to stop spread of child sexual abuse material online

Source: Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) published on this site Thursday 28 May 2026 by Jill Powell

Immaterialism will be among the first registrars to receive the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF)’s dedicated Registrar Alerts.

The UK-based domain name registrar has joined the IWF to help stop the spread of child sexual abuse images and videos online. Use of the new Registrar Alerts will enable even faster action when harmful domains are identified.

Immaterialism provides domain registration services with a focus on fairness, transparency and user protection. Drawing on a blend of technology, openness and a commitment to building a better internet, Immaterialism works to offer customers a balanced and responsible service across the domains it manages.

Online safety sits at the heart of Immaterialism – teams actively monitor for suspicious or abusive domain registrations, taking swift action when services are being misused. This includes shutting down domains linked to scams or any attempt to facilitate the distribution of child sexual abuse online. The new partnership with the IWF reinforces this proactive work and reflects a joint belief that safeguarding children is a shared responsibility across the internet ecosystem.

As well as taking the Registrar Alerts, Immaterialism will integrate the IWF’s Keywords List and Top Level Domain Hopping List into its domain monitoring and enforcement processes. This will build upon its ability to detect and disrupt domains associated with child sexual abuse images or videos, helping prevent both accidental and deliberate access.

The Keywords List is among several unique services the IWF provides to Members, helping to detect and disrupt the spread of the criminal content online.

These tools will support rapid intervention when abusive activity appears, contributing to safer online environments across the domains Immaterialism manages.

Immaterialism said: 

“Immaterialism is proud to be joining the Internet Watch Foundation, which reinforces our ongoing commitment to making the internet safer for everyone. As a domain registrar, partnering with the IWF strengthens our ability to rapidly identify and act against online child sexual abuse material. Harmful content has no place on the domains we manage and this collaboration reflects our belief that trust and safety must be embedded in the very foundations of the internet.”  

Kerry Smith, Internet Watch Foundation CEO, said: 

“We’re delighted to have Immaterialism come on board as a Member, and to be one of the first to receive our Registrar Alerts. The IWF is dedicated to stopping child sexual abuse online and our custom-built tools are designed to help identify, block and disrupt the spread of this criminal content.

“Last year our analysts found more child sexual abuse material than ever before. There has never been a more important time for organisations to work together and tackle this issue. Children’s safety online depends upon it.”  

Jail for man who sexually assaulted care home residents

Source: Kent Police published on this website Wednesday 27 May 2026 by Jill Powell

A care worker has been sentenced to a lengthy jail term after repeatedly sexually assaulting two vulnerable residents under his supervision.

In 2025, staff had grown increasingly concerned about David Jones’s behaviour towards certain residents. One colleague noted that Jones would visit one resident far more frequently than required, while neglecting to check on others in his care. On Wednesday 5 February 2025, Jones was working a night shift alongside two colleagues at a care facility in east Kent.

At around 3am, staff who were concerned for the welfare of the resident, followed Jones to the victim’s room. When they opened the door, they found him acting indecently towards the resident. He was immediately confronted and instructed to leave the room, and the victim was placed into the care of other staff members.

Staff reported the incident to Kent Police and officers attended Jones’s home address in South Road, Herne Bay, less than 24 hours later. They arrested him on suspicion of engaging in sexual activity with a person without consent. During the arrest, he was searched and a mobile phone was seized.

Investigators downloaded the content and uncovered multiple photos and videos of a sexual nature involving a second victim. Officers conducted a number of lines of enquiry and established that the images were taken during times Jones was on duty at the care home.

Evidence found on the phone concluded that the material strongly indicated the victim had been seriously sexually assaulted.

In addition to the images of the elderly victim, officers also discovered hundreds of indecent images of children.

The 53-year-old was later charged with multiple sexual offences including the possession of incident images of children. He pleaded guilty to all charges and on Friday 22 May 2026, at Canterbury Crown Court, he was sentenced to 19 years’ imprisonment.

Detective Sergeant Richard Allingham said:

“Instead of fulfilling his duty of care, Jones exploited vulnerable women for his own sexual gratification. His actions were deplorable and a profound breach of trust. I welcome the sentence handed down by the court today, and I want to thank the victims' families for their courage and support throughout this investigation.”

Three teenage boys sentenced after two girls raped in separate attacks

Source: Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) published on this website Friday 22 May 2026 by Jill Powell

Three teenage boys have today been sentenced after they were convicted of a knife-point rape and other serious sexual offences against two teenage girls in Hampshire.

The boys, who were aged 13, 14 and 14 at the time of the offences, cannot be named for legal reasons.

During a five-week trial at Southampton Crown Court which resulted in their convictions on 5 March 2026, jurors heard that the victims, aged 14 and 15 at the time, were attacked in separate incidents less than two months apart and were physically overpowered. The girls did not know one another.

In January 2025, a 14 year old girl was assaulted after becoming separated from her friends. She was threatened with a knife and forced to leave her mobile phone and AirTag in a shop so that her movements could not be tracked, before being taken to a secluded area.

Two defendants took it in turns to rape the victim while the others encouraged the offending and filmed the assaults. The defendants left the scene when they believed they had been disturbed. The victim was later found distressed and reported the incident to police.

Forensic evidence supported the victim’s account, including damage to her trousers consistent with the use of a sharp instrument.

The investigation later identified a second victim, aged 15, who was raped in November 2024 by two of the same defendants, both aged 14 at the time.

The court heard that the victim had met one of the defendants online and travelled alone to meet him. They were later joined by another boy and taken to an underpass, where she was raped by both of them.

Today at Southampton Crown Court, Boy A, from Hampshire, who was convicted of two counts of rape and count of taking indecent images of a child, has been sentenced to a three-year youth rehabilitation order.

Boy B, from Dorset, who was convicted of six counts of rape, has been sentenced to a three-year youth rehabilitation order.

Boy C, from Hampshire, who was convicted of two counts of rape, has been sentenced to an 18-month youth rehabilitation order.

Whenever a rape or serious sexual offence case involves a child suspect, it is reviewed by a prosecutor with expertise in both rape and youth offending.

As in all cases, the prosecutor will carefully consider all of the evidence. The prosecutor  will take into account the full circumstances of both the victim and the child suspect to ensure any decision to prosecute is fair, proportionate and reflects the gravity of the offence.

Lucy Paddick, of the Crown Prosecution Service, said:

“This is a deeply concerning case which involved a disturbing level of encouragement between young boys, who acted together to rape two young girls in separate incidents. These girls were forced into sexual activity by boys who brazenly filmed the deeply distressing incidents. After speaking with the victims in this case and reviewing an extensive file of evidence, it was the Crown Prosecution Service’s case that these girls were violated and could not have consented to these terrifying encounters. The CPS worked closely with Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary to support the victims and other young witnesses to give their evidence, and we commend them for the courage they showed throughout this trial. Our lawyers will work tirelessly to pursue justice for victims, and we will continue to hold those responsible for crimes of this devastating nature to account, regardless of their age.”

Siobhan Blake, National CPS Lead for Rape and Serious Sexual Offences (RASSO), said:

“It is deeply distressing to see any instance of sexual offending, especially when it involves young victims and offenders. Our prosecutors tell us they are seeing youth-on-youth cases with some involving more serious and more violent behaviour.  

“It is vital young people are educated and informed about consent and that harmful and misogynistic attitudes are tackled as early as possible to prevent these crimes. Everyone has a part to play. Young people must understand that sexual activity without consent is a serious criminal offence that can lead to them being prosecuted.

“To any young person who has been a victim of crime or who has seen or heard about sexual abuse happening – please tell a trusted adult. You are not in trouble, and we will be here to support you through the next steps.”

Statement from the Children’s Commissioner on the sentencing in the Fordingbridge rape case 24 May 2026

Source: Children’s Commissioners Office published on this website Tuesday 25 May 2026 by Jill Powell

In response to the news regarding the recent rape case, which was also published on this website Friday 22 May 2026.

Children’s Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza said: 

“The rape of two teenage girls in Fordingbridge is deeply disturbing and has shocked people across the country. My thoughts are first and foremost with the two girls and their families, who have shown extraordinary courage in speaking out about these heinous crimes.

“No child should experience the violence, humiliation and trauma described in this case. The impact of sexual violence does not end when an attack is over, it can impact every part of a young person’s life from their safety and confidence to their education, mental health and their future. It is essential that children who report abuse feel heard, protected and treated with dignity throughout the process.

“As Children’s Commissioner I welcome the urgent review being undertaken by the Attorney General. My office will be reaching out directly to the families involved to offer support. Children must know that if they speak up, adults and institutions will act decisively to keep them safe and deliver justice.”

Tech firms commit to stronger anti-grooming measures in response to Ofcom demands

Source: Ofcom published on this website Thursday 21 May 2026 by Jill Powell

Children in the UK will be better protected from harm as some of the largest and most popular sites and apps agree to introduce significant new anti-grooming measures in response to Ofcom’s public call for action.

Snap, Meta and Roblox have confirmed to the regulator that they will bring in new safety measures designed to better protect children from online strangers who wish them harm - ranging from tighter default settings for children’s contacts and friendship groups, to AI detection tools and direct chat controls.

These new commitments are included in a report, published today, which confirms how major platforms – Facebook, Instagram, Roblox, Snap, TikTok and YouTube – have responded to Ofcom’s demands in March to urgently strengthen protections for children online.

Under the new commitments secured for UK users, children’s safety will be considered upfront by platforms before new features are rolled out to them. In response to our call to end product-testing on children, five of the services have committed to notify the regulator whenever they update their risk assessments before making  significant changes to their services – going above and beyond their duties under the Online Safety Act.[1] This will ensure that Ofcom is aware of new products and features before they launch, allowing us an opportunity to scrutinise any adverse impact on children.  

Despite these important improvements, there are areas where the response from tech companies raises serious questions. We are particularly concerned about the lack of action from some platforms to make their feeds safer. Similarly, we are not convinced that the commitments from platforms with a strict minimum age of 13 will effectively prevent underage children from accessing their services.

Given these outstanding concerns, we have today announced a five-point action plan to drive further change and hold platforms to account for the safety of children on their platforms.

Online grooming can have devastating, lifelong consequences for victims and we demanded action from tech firms to introduce failsafe online protections for children against adult predators.

In response, Snap has agreed to make significant and long-overdue changes by adopting all the recommended grooming prevention measures under our Illegal Harms Codes. As a result, adult strangers will be prevented from contacting children on Snap by default, and children will no longer be encouraged to expand their friendship groups to people they don’t know. These protections apply only to children using Snap in the UK, and mean they will have stronger safeguards against grooming than users in other countries. The platform will also roll out highly effective age-checks to all users over the summer to ensure that all under-18s in the UK benefit from these new safety measures. 

Roblox has committed to build on its existing anti-grooming protections, announced earlier this year.[2] The company will now go even further, including by giving parents the ability to switch off direct chat services entirely for under-16s.

Meta has committed to developing a new setting that will hide teens’ connection lists on Instagram by default. The company also plans to roll out AI tools to detect likely sexualised conversations between adults and teens in Instagram direct messages, to report offending accounts to the NCMEC, and to take necessary enforcement action.

We are clear that these commitments must now translate into action. We’ve set clear deadlines by when we expect to see these changes in place and will be scrutinising how effectively they are implemented. We also want to see Meta go even further to prevent grooming and are pushing the company to adopt the network expansion prompts safety measure set out in our Illegal Harms Codes.[3]

If these promised improvements happen too slowly, or are not properly implemented, we will not hesitate to act. 

Content feeds are children’s primary pathway to harm and we are deeply concerned by the overall response from industry to our challenge to fix the problem.

Meta pledged to extend its 13+ “movie‑style” content settings currently available on Instagram to Facebook, which it says will make its feeds safer by limiting the content teens see to a more age-appropriate level. While this is encouraging, it is too early to tell whether this will meaningfully reduce harm in practice.

Notably, TikTok and YouTube failed to commit to any significant changes to reduce harmful content being served to children, maintaining their feeds are already safe for children. Our wealth of evidence, published today, suggests they are still not safe enough.[4]

Since the children’s online safety duties came into force in July 2025, there has been little change in children’s overall exposure to harmful content, with nearly three-quarters of 11- to 17-year-olds (73%) encountering it in a four-week period. Just over a third (35%) of these children recalled exposure to harmful content when they were ‘scrolling on their feed’. Half of secondary school aged children who see harmful content recall coming across it on TikTok (53%), followed by YouTube (excluding YouTube kids) (36%), Instagram (34%), and Facebook (31%).

We are sharing these concerns with government as it concludes its consultation: Growing up in the online world.[5]

We have already issued in-depth, legally-binding requests for information to Meta, TikTok and YouTube on how they detect and prevent children being exposed to harmful content and are currently interrogating their responses. In order to independently verify what services are telling us, we are exploring using new inspection powers under the Online Safety Act. This would require firms to undergo an independent audit - carried out by a skilled expert in this field - and allow us to issue remote inspection notices to observe how services’ content detection, moderation systems, algorithms and age-checks are working in real time.

We are determined to drive change by all means necessary, unless services can demonstrate urgent and credible action plans to make feeds safer for children. Any service that ultimately fails to comply with their duties to protect children, can expect enforcement action.[6]

Tougher legislation to underpin minimum age enforcement

Despite acknowledging the importance of minimum age policies, none of the companies with a minimum age of 13 on their services convinced us that they are currently enforcing them effectively and the impact is clear. Our latest research shows that 84% of children aged 8–12 are still using one of the top five reaching online services (YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat) despite a minimum age of 13.[7]

Current online safety laws do not explicitly require services to keep underage children off their platforms by using robust age checks, although the Information Commissioner’s Office can take action in this area under data protection law. [8] We have today written to the Secretary of State to advise that, should Government and Parliament wish Ofcom to be able to force firms to enforce minimum age policies effectively, this would need a clearer basis in online safety legislation.

Ofcom’s public scrutiny of these six online services will continue under our five-point action plan. We will continue to drive change by: 

  1. Monitoring the implementation of services’ new commitments to ensure they work in practice to better protect children.
  2. Continuing to review evidence on recommender feeds and explore whether to use new inspection powers, with a further update in July.
  3. Launching enforcement action where we have grounds to suspect non-compliance with the Online Safety Act.
  4. Continuing to monitor the real-world experiences of children online through our world-class research.
  5. Engaging with Government on the outcome of its consultation so that enforcement of minimum age policies under online safety laws can be strengthened where needed.