SAFE
CIC
The Safeguarding Specialists
01379 871091

SAFE Newsfeed

New guidance for parents and carers as AI-manipulated images of children become a growing concern

Source: Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) published on this website Friday 10 July 2026 by Jill Powell

Parents and carers are being alerted to the growing threat of children’s images shared online being manipulated into AI generated sexual abuse material.

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) and the National Crime Agency (NCA) have seen an increase in online offenders exploiting openly available images of children to create realistic sexualised content.

IWF analysts found 3,440 AI-generated videos of child sexual abuse in 2025, compared to just 13 in 2024, and the NCA have increasingly seen offenders exploiting AI technologies to target children in new ways.

AI child sexual abuse material is illegal and causes real harm, even where an image has been artificially created or manipulated it contributes to the abuse and exploitation of children and can have a devastating impact.

In response to this real and growing threat, the IWF and NCA have launched a new campaign, supporting parents and carers to make informed decisions about their children’s images.

Adverts running on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, will help parents, carers, and others to consider image consent and actions they can take to better protect their children.

Alongside the social media campaign, the organisations have also issued new guidance for parents and carers, as concerns grow about criminals’ access to children’s imagery.

The guidance aims to help people find safe ways to share images of their children without risking them falling into the hands of those who may be looking to exploit them by using AI to create nude or sexual imagery.

It will also include advice on speaking to children and young people about AI and deepfake nudes and image consent, as well as what to do if they are targeted or imagery of them is made or shared online.

The new guidance states: “You may have already discussed image consent with friends, family and even within the places your child attends like schools and clubs.

“It can be helpful to revisit these conversations and involve your child, especially as they get older and start exploring new spaces online. Talk about how they feel about their photos being taken or shared, and help them to understand it’s okay to say no.”

When reviewing image consent for sharing of photography, parents and carers are asked to consider:

  • Am I still comfortable with how my child’s images might be used?
  • Have my preferences changed?
  • Do I want to limit or withdraw consent?
  • It’s ok to ask people not to post photos or videos of your child online

It also suggests creating a ‘close friends’ group for parents still wanting to share images online, or limiting visibility so only selected people can see them, as well as advice on speaking to children and young people about AI, ‘deepfake’ nudes and image consent and what to do if they are targeted or imagery of them is made or shared online.

This follows similar advice issued to education professionals by the IWF and the NCA last year, providing information on how to protect student images from AI manipulation.

The new advice comes after the IWF warned about criminal gangs who had targeted a school in the UK. The gang had taken imagery of the school’s pupils from a school website and, using AI, created more than 100 sexual images of the children.

They then tried to blackmail the school into paying to prevent the images being put online.

The IWF, which is the UK-based organisation working globally to remove and block child sexual abuse imagery from the internet, acted quickly to help make sure the images would be stopped from being uploaded - but fears remain that more schools could be targeted. 

Kerry Smith, Chief Executive of the IWF, said: 

The threat is disturbing. If someone’s imagery is online, they could be easy pickings for criminals and anyone, especially children, could find themselves being targeted. 

“We don’t want to say don’t share your children’s images with the people you love and trust, but we want everyone to be aware of the potential risks and make an informed decision with the full facts at their disposal. These are not hypothetical threats, they are real.  

“The impact of this imagery can be devastating. The harms are very real. And the potential for lasting damage is something which I think every parent would do anything they can to prevent. We want to give them back that power, and start a public conversation about whether we should be sharing imagery online as a default.”  

Tim Wright from the National Crime Agency said: 

"Artificial intelligence tools are becoming more powerful, more widely available and easier to use, and we are seeing offenders exploit them to target children in new ways. Images shared online, even everyday family photos, can be stolen and manipulated to create sexualised content without a child or parent's knowledge.

“While we and policing colleagues tackle offenders, prevention remains vital. We encourage parents and carers to take a few simple steps today: review the privacy settings on social media accounts; think carefully about who can access images of their children; and talk openly with family, friends, schools and clubs about image sharing and consent. Most importantly, if something does go wrong, stay calm, reassure your child that they are not to blame, and report concerns to the police or CEOP so action can be taken as quickly as possible”

Images and videos of child sexual abuse are illegal in the UK whether they have been made with AI or not. The IWF warns AI-generated child sexual abuse is becoming more and more widespread, and is increasingly lifelike as technology improves.

  • In 2025, the IWF identified 8,029 AI-generated images and videos of realistic child sexual abuse, a 14% increase in criminal AI content on the previous year.
  • An additional 82 items were classed as prohibited, actioned under UK law even if the material is not photorealistic, such as cartoons, illustrations and animations.
  • Of the 3,443 AI-generated child sexual abuse videos identified, which is a more than 260-fold increase on the 13 videos found in 2024, 65% were classified as Category A. This is the most severe legal category under UK law which encompasses offences such as rape, sexual torture and bestiality.
  • By comparison, 43% of non-AI criminal videos seen by the IWF in 2025 were Category A – demonstrating that AI is being used to create more violent content.

The IWF says tech companies must evaluate and safeguard AI models before releasing them to make it harder for criminals to abuse AI image generators and create child sexual abuse imagery.

Man who encouraged child abuse facilitators to make children ‘cry’ sentenced

Source: National Crime Agency published on this website Thursday 9 July 2026 by Jill Powell

A man who encouraged child sexual abuse facilitators to make their victims ‘cry’ has been sentenced, following a National Crime Agency investigation.

The NCA launched an investigation into Christopher Sanders, 50, from Hinckley, Leicestershire, after receiving intelligence from international partners in July 2023 about a UK individual who was a prolific purchaser of live-streaming content.

From August 2017 to February 2019 Sanders used online communication platform Skype to contact five facilitators based in the Philippines who were known, had been previously arrested, or were suspected of inciting the abuse of children.

When striking up conversations Sanders would repeatedly ask if the user was ‘young’. After identifying them as facilitators, he would ask about their access to children, saying he could pay in the form of ‘tips’ via legitimate adult streaming websites.

When requesting abuse material Sanders would repeatedly ask for victims to be physically abused, in multiple cases asking for them to be made to ‘cry’.

If content was not provided quickly enough or to his liking, Sanders would send verbal abuse to the facilitators.

NCA officers were able to track down Sanders after analysing information associated with his Skype account. This included links to 22 PayPal accounts, email addresses, his home address and mobile number.

Sanders was arrested in April 2024. Officers searched his home and seized a number of electronic devices, some of which contained 20 images of categories A and C, as well as extreme pornography and evidence of his chat activity.

Sanders pleaded guilty to all charges in February 2026 at Leicester Crown Court. He was sentenced to 32 months' imprisonment at the same court today [Tuesday 7 July]. He has also been handed a Sexual Harm Prevention order (SHPO) and will be on the Sex Offender's Register, both for life.

NCA Senior Investigating Officer Maria Powell said:

Sanders delighted in the horrific abuse of children that his sadistic tastes incited. His truly warped mentality was revealed in the violent requests he made and which would have continued had he not been arrested. The NCA along with partners at home and abroad will continue to track down offenders like Sanders and protect the most vulnerable in our society from those who do them harm.”

Consultation outcome: Establishing the Child Protection Authority in England

Source: Department of Education published on this website Tuesday 7 July 2026 by Jill Powell

Detail of outcome

Respondents showed strong support for a Child Protection Authority (CPA) in England. The government will use the findings to inform the CPA’s future role, functions and powers, including its ability to:

  • identify emerging risks
  • strengthen the use of data and evidence
  • support workforce development
  • address serious and persistent failings

Consultation on establishing a Child Protection Authority: analysis of responses

Establishing a Child Protection Authority in England: government consultation response

Statutory guidance for schools and colleges on safeguarding children and safer recruitment. Published July 7 2026 in force 1 September 2026

Source: Department for Education published on this website Wednesday 8 July 2026 by Jill Powell

Keeping children safe in education 2026

‘Keeping children safe in education 2026’ is for information only and does not come into force until 1 September 2026.

Schools and colleges must continue to use ‘Keeping children safe in education 2025’ until 31 August 2026.

Consultation outcomes

Keeping children safe in education: proposed revisions 2026

The Department for Education is proposing changes to Keeping children safe in education 2025 (for use until 31 August 2026)

The statutory guidance sets out:

  • what schools and colleges should do
  • the legal duties that they must comply with to keep children safe

The main proposed changes are listed in annex D of the draft statutory guidance document.

Rape victims to get opportunity for case review before prosecution is stopped as CPS rolls out pilot across England and Wales

Source: Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) published on this website Monday 6 July 2026 by Jill Powell

The first victims of rape have seen cases continue following second review as a pioneering pilot reaches the one-year mark – the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has said.

The CPS and the Solicitor General (SG) have announced the pilot will be rolled out nationally across all 14 CPS Areas from next week, to support high-quality decision making in some of the most serious cases.

The existing CPS’s Victims’ Right to Review (VRR) scheme allows victims to challenge decisions not to bring or to stop a prosecution.

If a case is stopped in court by prosecutors offering no evidence, it cannot legally be restarted. That is because of the legal framework in England and Wales.

But under a first-of-its-kind CPS pilot, rape victims are told in advance if their case might be stopped – giving them the chance to request a review before that happens.

Under the Early VRR pilot, victims of rape whose cases are eligible are told in advance if their case might be stopped. They can request a review before that happens.

This means that if a second prosecutor concludes the case should continue, it can still proceed.

Siobhan Blake, National CPS Lead for Rape and Serious Sexual Offences, said:

“For survivors of rape and sexual offences, the possibility their abuser may never face justice can be deeply distressing.

“Victims must have confidence that every decision is made with care and expertise. Our specialist prosecutors usually get it right first time, but when we don’t – and a case that could have continued is stopped – an apology alone cannot feel like justice.  

“Some victims in the pilot have told us that simply having this option makes a positive difference, and two cases continuing shows the impact it can have.

“Expanding the pilot will help us better understand how to support victims and ensure the right decisions are made.”

The CPS has also published research today on how other similar jurisdictions work in comparison to England and Wales. The research done by the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law was commissioned to consider the power the CPS has to ‘discontinue’ cases in England and Wales, rather than officially stopping them in court. ‘Discontinuing’ cases allows them to be restarted where there is a good reason to do so – such as VRR or more evidence becoming available.

The VRR pilot works within the current jurisdiction, with cases in which the CPS would be offering no evidence in court.

The expansion of the Early VRR pilot will give prosecutors more evidence towards its final evaluation, which is already showing benefits for victims and supporting high-quality decision-making in some of the most challenging cases.

Most decisions to offer no evidence are upheld after a victim asks for a review – both in the pilot and as part of the normal VRR scheme. But occasionally, under the current VRR scheme, in some cases, a prosecution that could have continued may be stopped.

Across the four pilot Areas — West Midlands, North West, Yorkshire and Humberside, and Cymru-Wales — 28 victims were offered a review.

Fourteen requested a review. Twelve decisions were upheld, and two were overturned, allowing those cases to continue. They are now awaiting trial.

What is the pilot?

Criminal cases can be stopped at any point if prosecutors decide there is no longer a realistic prospect of conviction. If that decision is made after a case has progressed beyond a certain point, the CPS must offer no evidence in court, resulting in an acquittal.

Under the existing VRR scheme, victims can already request a review of certain decisions not to start or to stop a prosecution. However, if the case is stopped in court through ‘offering no evidence’, nothing further can be done even if the second prosecutor disagrees: the only remedy is an apology.

The Early VRR pilot changes this.

RASSO victims will now be told when a provisional decision is made to offer no evidence. They are given the opportunity to ask for a second prosecutor to review the evidence before that decision is approved.

If the second prosecutor considers that the two-stage test in the Code for Crown Prosecutors is met, the prosecution proceeds.